In this week’s episode, we delve into the latest developments and controversies in federal politics. The Voice to Parliament has consumed parliamentary discussions throughout the week, with Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton sowing seeds of division, contrasting with the recent goodwill exhibited at the Garma festival in Arnhem Land. The festival, a platform for cultural exchange, was a backdrop for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s call for Dutton’s participation, and Dutton’s negative response that raises serious questions about his leadership credentials.
His actions are solely geared towards securing his leadership position and catering to the ambitions of his party in the upcoming federal election but his reluctance to engage directly with Indigenous communities and preference for certain right-wing media outlets brings up concerns about his commitment to representing diverse interests – essential for a leader who wishes to become prime minister.
The Sofronoff report was released during the week, and it was meant to shed light on the mishandling of the trial of Bruce Lehrmann, exposing various missteps in the criminal justice system. From the involvement of Liberal Party Ministers to the Australian Federal Police’s actions, and the poor treatment of the complainant Brittany Higgins, we uncover a web of errors that has shaken public trust. The report seems more like a hit-job on Public Prosecutor Shane Drumgold, and the outcomes contained within the report led to his resignation. KC Walter Sofronoff’s communication with a News Corporation journalist and the subsequent report release added another layer of complexity to this ongoing saga, and we may need to hold another inquiry, into the inquiry.
We look into recent the media scrutiny surrounding politicians’ family members. The case of Nathan Albanese, the son of the Prime Minister, receiving a Qantas Chairman’s Lounge VIP has triggered discussions on the boundaries between politicians and their families. Drawing comparisons with past instances, we reflect on media portrayals of similar situations involving politicians from different parties – for example, there was little scrutiny when the Tony Abbott’s daughter became a brand ambassador for BMW, so why is there so much scrutiny on the son of a Labor prime minister?
We explore the television series “Kitchen Cabinet”, which blends culinary endeavours with political discussions, seeking to humanise politicians beyond their public personas. There have criticisms raised against the concept, questioning whether this attempt to present politicians in a personal light is necessary or if their actions in the political arena should speak for themselves. One episode from 2015 featured Scott Morrison preparing a Sri Lankan fish curry at a time when he turned back Sri Lankan asylum seekers, glossing over serious issues in favour of more light-hearted banter.
Politicians should be judged on their political actions, not on whether they can cook up a curry or not, and “Kitchen Cabinet” is a reflection of the sad state of political coverage in Australia.
Support independent journalism
We don’t plead, beseech, beg, guilt-trip, or gaslight you and claim the end of the world of journalism is coming soon. We keep it simple: If you like our work and would like to support it, send a donation, from as little as $5. Or purchase one of our books! It helps to keep our commitment to independent journalism ticking over! Go to our supporter page to see the many ways you can support New Politics.